Aşa cum am spus, noi scurtcircuităm întreaga noastră educaţie, cultură şi cunoaştere (specifică lumii noastre, lumii „civilizate”), pentru a empatiza cu lumea şamanului.
Găselniţa propusă prin termenul de „quasişaman”, constă în evidenţierea şi analizarea faptului că respectiva scurtcircuitare, urmată de empatia inerentă, nu sunt doar spontane, mute şi subiective, consecinţe specifice contactului cu lumea şamanului, ci că acest tip de dispoziţie e deja in noi şi în propria noastră cultura. Suntem noi înşine ca („quasi”) nişte şamani tocmai prin procesul pe care îl presupune acestă scurtcircuitare, sau mai bine spus autoscurtcircuitare. Deci suntem descendenţi direcţi ai şamanilor şi egali cu ei.
Interesul meu se opreşte aici: în a arată, nu doar că fiecare descriere teoretică şi mărturie a scurtcircuitării/empatie este o devenire quasişamanică, ci că există realmente o devenire quasi şamanică (dar nu mimesis şamanic) şi în consecinţă o quasipractică a acestei deveniri. Voi revenii ulterior asupra sensului acestei identificări şi a sensului acestei quasipractici.
Abordarea mea are un caracter teoretic, însă scopul final este acela de a contribui la cultura psihedelica (psihedelicul din cultura pop la un nivel grassroots, activist chiar), şi, mai ales, la spiritualitatea vremii în care trăim. Voi încerca, prin intermediul unor instrumente teoretice să identific şi să definesc o anumită dispoziţie generală (a conştiinţei) pe care o voi numi de acum încolo dispoziţie quasişamanică. Principala mărturie şi exemplu al acestei dispoziţii este experienţa interioară descrisă de Bataille în eseul cu acelşi nume, însă filtrată de perspectivele spirituale emanate de mişcarea psihedelică contemporană. Prin intermediul fenomenologiei genetice voi încerca să analizez şi să descriu trăsăturile esenţiale ale dispoziţiei quasişamanice, iar prin intermediul bogăţiei conceptuale brute deleuziene şi a manierei de creaţie conceptuală specifice, voi încerca să construiesc un limbaj teoretic şi quasi teoretic al acestei experienţe şi dispoziţii. Cred că partea originală din această întreprindere este analiza fenomenologică a experienţelor psihedelice ori empatice lumii psihedelice şi şamanice. (Aceasta ar fi contribuţia mea teoretică la cultura psihedelică, o abordare fenomenologică a psihedelicului.)
Totusi intregul travaliu teoretic este deposedat de orice valoare in sine. Prin platforma "indeajuns de filosofic" vreau sa construiesc o maniera de manipulare a filosofiei care sa ramina in granitele intelegerii extracomune, quasistiintifice si quasiteoretica, nespecifica, nesupusa unor reguli de autorizare, neinitiata, amatoreasca, caracteristica tipului de cultura pop regasita online.
Platforma "indeajuns de filosofic" se vrea a fi o platforma online de studiu filozofic care urmeaza niste reguli nonexegetice si nonlogocentric. Scopul acestei platforme este acela de a dezvolta o maniera de intelegere a filozofiei si intelepciunii europene in general la un nivel nonacademic, tinind cont de experienta personala si directa cu evenimentele, mediumul si sursele prin care fiecare dintre noi ia contact cu filozofia si intelepciunea europeana.
Principiile de baza ale acestei reguli sunt:
1. Intelegerea oricarei idei filosofice este indeajuns de buna in masura in care ea trezeste o cautare proprie vie care isi e autosuficienta si continuaa si nu este cautata exactitatea ei si corespondenta ei cu traditia filozofica (aceasta este un interes secundar in comparatie cu empatia si cautarea interioara)
2. Orice exprimare a intelegerii capatate nu este logocentrica, adica nu se inscrie intr-un tip de discurs argumentativ in care folosirea tehnica a limbii joaca un rol esential (conceptualism). In incercarea de a exprima o intelegere filosofica, intervin elemnte nondiscursive (precum marturii multimedia, etc.) plus, orice element inerent acestei exprimarii are statutl de marturie si are valoare de enunt foucauldian.
Odata asumata acesta platforma de lucru, ceea ce va ramine util in travaliul meu sper sa fie un continuu motiv de scurtcircuitare si empatie specifice dispozitiei quasi shamanice si, concret vorbind, un motiv de nastere si intensificare a fiecarei experiente interioare personala.
Website Translator
About post-industrial quasi-shamanic beliefs
We are all, in a sens, idolaters of this recent western cultural artifact called "shamanism"; we love, we cherish, we dedicate our self to it, but as much as we get involve, so little we have something to do with the original, indigenous shamanism; we've created a lie, an illusion and we keep doing it just because this is how our culture works... you don't practice shamanism to sell it and to achieve personal transformation, shamanism it happens to be practiced because the world has unmanageable situations and because life is precarious and unforeseeable , because some people (the shamans) are forced to talk to the spirits and to heal the sick people... they are not doing it for fun or for them, they are doing it because there are some forces beyond them that affects them. I'm not speaking about the "real" shamans, it does not matter this point of view, it only matters our illusion, our lie, our self-limitation. This is what I want to know about and I want to fight against.
My point is that the only accurate perspective or maybe the only "right" place of shamanism in our culture, can be found in the scholarly literature of ethnology, sociology, anthropology, psychology and history of religion, but not as a proclamation of scientific objectivity of our powerful western culture, but because this is the only really "fair" usage of this cultural artifact called "shamanism", meaning - the only aspect of our shamanic intelligibility that is not intentionally mixing indigenous culture with western culture, that is just acquiring information. I'm interested in scholarly literature at its most psychological or subjective (read it "weak") level, as a culture who tries not to conquer, to engulf another culture but just to understand it.
Note: this is an important shift of my search. Perhaps this blog will die or will become something else.
03.02.2009
I'm returning to this blog and leave it as it is, it's ok as it is...
I'll add some more links at the bottom.
30.12.2009
My point is that the only accurate perspective or maybe the only "right" place of shamanism in our culture, can be found in the scholarly literature of ethnology, sociology, anthropology, psychology and history of religion, but not as a proclamation of scientific objectivity of our powerful western culture, but because this is the only really "fair" usage of this cultural artifact called "shamanism", meaning - the only aspect of our shamanic intelligibility that is not intentionally mixing indigenous culture with western culture, that is just acquiring information. I'm interested in scholarly literature at its most psychological or subjective (read it "weak") level, as a culture who tries not to conquer, to engulf another culture but just to understand it.
Note: this is an important shift of my search. Perhaps this blog will die or will become something else.
03.02.2009
I'm returning to this blog and leave it as it is, it's ok as it is...
I'll add some more links at the bottom.
30.12.2009
Sunday, October 15, 2006
Publicat de
Marius Stoica
la
1:34 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
Links
About
This is the log of a work in progress. I'm tryning to keep here acount of all my quasi-shamanic inspiration - the medium - so, please, do keep in mind that these posts are in fact the actual WORK that some day will be presented as a finished work - the message - (I hope it will be a book, but I certanly see this only as a last "bagage" that I have to throw away to free myself).
You can email me at -mariustoica_at_gmail_ dot_ com- for any question or opinion that you might have regarding my work.
Some info about myself: My name is Marius Stoica, I live in Timisoara (Romania), I'm 27 years old. Next week I'll get merried and my wife is pregnant in 4 months :) I've studied philosophy with an emphasis on contemporary french philosphy and some on phenomenology. In fact, I'm pretty influenced by authors like Battaille, Deleuze, Husserl or Marc Richir. I also don't like corporatism and imperialism and I try to resist to all the crap that the world is more and more filled in.
8 September 2007
----------------
Trecem la modul freestyle
7 Octombrie 2008
You can email me at -mariustoica_at_gmail_ dot_ com- for any question or opinion that you might have regarding my work.
Some info about myself: My name is Marius Stoica, I live in Timisoara (Romania), I'm 27 years old. Next week I'll get merried and my wife is pregnant in 4 months :) I've studied philosophy with an emphasis on contemporary french philosphy and some on phenomenology. In fact, I'm pretty influenced by authors like Battaille, Deleuze, Husserl or Marc Richir. I also don't like corporatism and imperialism and I try to resist to all the crap that the world is more and more filled in.
8 September 2007
----------------
Trecem la modul freestyle
7 Octombrie 2008
No comments:
Post a Comment